Composition laws via stacks: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
b) Think about applications to composition laws | b) Think about applications to composition laws | ||
* do comp laws hold over arbitrary rings? | |||
* try to use the "kernel thing" to generate new composition laws. (Need non-special groups. The usual setup uses pre-homogenous spaces. Maybe find some 'near misses' -- i.e., setups that people don't study because they don't give PHV's [what's a PHV? [[User:Anton|Anton]] 13:02, 21 November 2011 (PST)] | |||
* I don't really understand yet how people use composition laws to prove other cool theorems. | |||
* Melanie and Dan's paper, references to Melanie's thesis, etc | |||
[[Category:DZB]] | |||
Latest revision as of 13:02, 21 November 2011
Composition law paper todo:
a) Go over composition law proofs
b) Think about applications to composition laws
- do comp laws hold over arbitrary rings?
- try to use the "kernel thing" to generate new composition laws. (Need non-special groups. The usual setup uses pre-homogenous spaces. Maybe find some 'near misses' -- i.e., setups that people don't study because they don't give PHV's [what's a PHV? Anton 13:02, 21 November 2011 (PST)]
- I don't really understand yet how people use composition laws to prove other cool theorems.
- Melanie and Dan's paper, references to Melanie's thesis, etc