Talk:Main Page

Have a comment? Leave it here.

Comment!

You're using a Wiki, that allows for external contributions, for a personal website. It's slightly logical, but I'm wondering if you actually considered it while building the site.

Your logo is a weasel with expensive taste in wine and ... good bread? Oddly enough, this makes more sense to me then the wiki.

Either way, the site itself is enjoyable, though seldom updated...

Hi! Thanks for leaving a comment. I recently (~6 months ago) converted my personal site to a wiki. The main reason is that I found it was a pain to update my web page, so I would almost never do it. As a wiki, the editing mechanism is sufficiently smooth that I find it easier to update. Though the content doesn't change much, I do find it handy. I've tried it as a sort of quasi-public notebook where I dump ideas I have about some topic (e.g. Properties of morphisms or Artin's criterion for representability), but I don't have a strong argument in favor of this behavior. In part, I just wanted to learn more about wikis and explore the possibilities of the platform.

The fact that it allows for external contributions isn't a problem. Important pages (like the home page, my CV page, or my research page) are protected so that only I can edit them. It did take me several tries to get an effective way to avoid spam (see Working with MediaWiki#Handling Spam).

I can't make much sense of the logo for you. It's a combination of clip art that came with my wife's first computer. For some reason, I started using it as my site logo many years ago, and it stuck.

Anton 16:45, 10 January 2012 (PST)